Replaces Epic Cosmos

The map of
human disease.
Open to all.

Federated, de-identified, vendor-agnostic clinical data for the research that changes medicine.

Atlas replaces Epic Cosmos with a federated research data network that is not captive to a single EHR vendor. Where Cosmos aggregates data exclusively from Epic customers, Atlas federates de-identified clinical data from any EHR — Epic, Oracle Health, Meditech, athenahealth, and independent systems — creating a research dataset that is representative of the full diversity of American healthcare, not just the institutions wealthy enough to afford a single vendor's platform. The research that changes medicine should not be limited to the data of organizations that made the same purchasing decision.

280M+
De-identified patient records across the federated network
12B+
Clinical encounters spanning inpatient, outpatient, and post-acute settings
0
Vendor lock-in — any EHR system can contribute and query
<60s
Average query execution time across the federated network
The Research Data Crisis

The data that could cure diseases is locked inside vendor silos.

Clinical data is the most valuable research asset in medicine. Every diagnosis, every lab result, every medication prescribed, every outcome observed represents a data point that could contribute to discovering a new treatment, identifying a new risk factor, or validating a new clinical pathway. But this data is fragmented across thousands of institutions, stored in proprietary formats controlled by EHR vendors, and accessible only through vendor-specific tools that exclude institutions using competing platforms. Epic Cosmos contains data from 300 million patients — but only from Epic customers. The safety-net hospitals, rural clinics, and community health centers that serve the populations most underrepresented in clinical research are disproportionately likely to use non-Epic systems. The result is a research dataset that is vast but biased — a map of human disease that systematically excludes the communities where disease burden is highest.

95%
Of clinical data never used for research — trapped in operational systems without research access
80%
Of clinical trial participants are White — in part because research data sources underrepresent minorities
17 years
Average time for clinical research findings to reach routine practice — data access is a primary bottleneck
Single-vendor
Current research networks exclude institutions that use different EHR platforms
Core Capabilities

Eight layers. One complete picture.

Atlas is not a data warehouse. It is a federated network where data stays at the contributing institution and queries travel to the data — not the other way around. This architecture preserves institutional data sovereignty, simplifies regulatory compliance, and eliminates the security risk of centralizing hundreds of millions of patient records in a single repository.

01
Federated Data Fabric & De-Identification Engine
Queries travel to the data — patient records never leave the institution

Traditional research data networks aggregate patient records into a central repository — creating a single point of vulnerability, a massive regulatory compliance burden, and an architectural dependence on the vendor who controls the repository. Atlas inverts this model. Each participating institution deploys a local Atlas node that transforms clinical data from its native EHR format into the OMOP Common Data Model, applies HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification with expert determination validation, and exposes a query interface that responds to federated queries from authorized researchers. The query executes locally against the institution's own data, returns only aggregate or de-identified results to the researcher, and the raw patient data never leaves the institution's firewall. This architecture supports participation from any EHR vendor — Epic, Oracle Health, Meditech, or custom systems — because the transformation to OMOP occurs at the local node, not at the source.

OMOP Common Data Model
HIPAA Safe Harbor De-ID
Expert Determination Validation
Local Query Execution
Multi-EHR Source Support
Institutional Data Sovereignty
0
Patient records that leave the contributing institution
100%
HIPAA Safe Harbor compliance with expert determination
Any
EHR vendor supported through OMOP transformation
02
Self-Service Research Query Builder
Visual cohort definition without SQL — from question to answer in minutes, not months

Clinical researchers should not need a data analyst to answer a clinical question. Atlas provides a visual query builder that allows researchers to define cohorts, apply inclusion and exclusion criteria, select outcome variables, and execute queries across the federated network — all through a point-and-click interface that requires no SQL, no programming, and no data engineering expertise. A medical student can define a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes diagnosed before age 40 who were treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists and measure their 5-year cardiovascular event rate — and receive results from 280 million patient records in under 60 seconds. The same query through a traditional data request process would take 6 to 12 months. Atlas democratizes access to the data that drives medical discovery.

Visual Cohort Builder
Drag-Drop Criteria Selection
Cross-Network Execution
No SQL Required
Temporal Query Logic
Result Visualization
<60s
Average query execution time across federated network
0
Programming skills required to query 280M+ patients
12mo→1hr
Time-to-answer reduction vs. traditional data request
03
Real-World Evidence & Observational Studies
Generate regulatory-grade RWE from federated clinical data for drug safety and effectiveness

Real-world evidence from observational data is increasingly accepted by the FDA as supplemental evidence for drug safety and effectiveness. Atlas provides the infrastructure for rigorous observational studies at scale: propensity score matching across millions of patients, time-to-event analyses with competing risk adjustment, negative control outcome validation to detect systematic bias, and study design templates that follow OHDSI best practices for distributed network studies. Pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers, and regulatory agencies can execute the same study protocol simultaneously across every participating institution — with results aggregated without any institution sharing patient-level data. This is not retrospective chart review. This is population-scale epidemiology executed in real time.

Propensity Score Matching
Time-to-Event Analysis
Negative Control Validation
OHDSI Study Templates
Distributed Network Studies
FDA RWE Compliance
280M+
Patient records available for observational study design
100%
OHDSI best practice compliance for study methodology
0
Patient-level data shared between institutions
04
Clinical Trial Network & Cohort Discovery
Find eligible patients across 280M+ records before the trial opens — not after it struggles to enroll

Eighty percent of clinical trials fail to meet enrollment timelines. The primary reason is not lack of eligible patients — it is inability to find them. Atlas transforms trial feasibility and recruitment by allowing sponsors and investigators to query the federated network with a trial's eligibility criteria before the first site is activated. The system returns de-identified cohort counts by institution, geography, and demographic composition — enabling sponsors to select sites based on actual patient availability rather than investigator reputation. Once a trial is active, Clarion Praxis's auto-screening module identifies eligible patients at participating institutions and presents them to the investigator with a one-click referral to the research coordinator. The connection between Atlas (discovery) and Praxis (enrollment) creates a closed loop from feasibility to accrual that no single-vendor research network can replicate.

Pre-Trial Feasibility Queries
Site Selection Intelligence
Demographic Representation
EHR-Based Screening
Praxis Enrollment Integration
Accrual Tracking Dashboard
3.8x
Improvement in clinical trial enrollment velocity
42%
Increase in minority enrollment through diverse network representation
<48hr
Feasibility query turnaround — vs. 6–12 weeks traditional
05
Predictive Modeling & Foundation Model Access
Train and validate clinical prediction models on population-scale federated data

Clinical prediction models are only as good as the data they are trained on. A model trained on a single institution's data reflects that institution's patient population, practice patterns, and biases. Atlas enables federated model training where the model travels to the data, trains locally at each participating institution, and returns only model parameters — not patient data — to be aggregated into a global model. This federated learning architecture produces models that are more generalizable, more equitable, and more robust than any single-institution model. Atlas also provides access to pre-trained clinical foundation models — large-scale models trained on billions of structured clinical events that can be fine-tuned for specific prediction tasks: 30-day readmission, disease progression, treatment response, and adverse event risk.

Federated Model Training
Clinical Foundation Models
Fine-Tuning Toolkit
Model Validation Suite
Bias & Equity Auditing
FHIR-Based Model Deployment
12B+
Clinical encounters available for foundation model training
0
Patient data shared during federated model training
23%
Average generalizability improvement vs. single-institution models
06
Genomics & Multi-Omics Integration
Link genomic variants, biomarkers, and molecular data to longitudinal clinical outcomes

The future of precision medicine depends on linking molecular data to clinical outcomes at population scale. Atlas extends the federated data model to include structured genomic variants, pharmacogenomic profiles, tumor biomarkers, and multi-omics data from participating institutions that perform next-generation sequencing. A researcher studying the relationship between a specific BRCA2 variant and treatment response to PARP inhibitors can query Atlas for patients carrying that variant across the entire network and analyze their longitudinal treatment outcomes, adverse events, and survival data — without any institution sharing identifiable genomic data. This is the infrastructure that makes precision medicine research possible at the scale where rare variants become statistically analyzable.

Genomic Variant Repository
Pharmacogenomics Linkage
Tumor Biomarker Correlation
Multi-Omics Data Fabric
Variant-to-Outcome Analysis
Rare Variant Aggregation
4.2M
Genomic records linked to longitudinal clinical data
100%
De-identified — no identifiable genomic data leaves institution
340+
Actionable pharmacogenomic gene-drug pairs supported
07
Privacy-Preserving Analytics & Governance
Differential privacy, k-anonymity, and institutional governance that researchers trust and IRBs approve

Research data networks live or die on trust. Institutions must trust that their data will not be misused. Patients must trust that their privacy is protected. IRBs must trust that the regulatory framework is sound. Atlas builds trust through architectural guarantees, not just policies. Differential privacy adds calibrated noise to query results to prevent re-identification of small populations. K-anonymity thresholds suppress results from cells with fewer than a configurable minimum number of patients. Every query is logged with the researcher's identity, institutional affiliation, stated research purpose, and IRB approval status. A community-elected governance council — modeled on the OHDSI governance framework — oversees data use policies, reviews access requests, and audits compliance. The governance is not vendor-controlled. It is researcher-controlled.

Differential Privacy Engine
K-Anonymity Enforcement
Complete Query Audit Trail
IRB Approval Tracking
Community Governance Council
Institutional Opt-In/Out Controls
0
Re-identification events since network launch
100%
Query audit trail completeness
Community
Governance — researcher-elected, not vendor-controlled
08
Research Publication & Data Sharing
From query to manuscript with reproducible study packages and FAIR-compliant data sharing

Research that never reaches publication changes nothing. Atlas includes a research lifecycle management layer that supports the journey from hypothesis to manuscript. Reproducible study packages capture the complete methodology — cohort definition, variable selection, statistical analysis plan, and code — in a format that can be shared with peer reviewers and re-executed by other researchers on their own institutional data. FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are built into every output. Study results can be published to a shared research repository where other institutions can validate findings against their own populations, creating a cycle of discovery, validation, and clinical implementation that accelerates the 17-year bench-to-bedside timeline.

Reproducible Study Packages
FAIR Data Compliance
Peer Validation Network
Cross-Institution Replication
Manuscript Data Export
DOI-Registered Datasets
100%
Study methodology reproducibility through packaged protocols
84%
Cross-institution validation success rate for published findings
17yr→4yr
Target bench-to-bedside timeline acceleration
Competitive Analysis

Atlas vs. Epic Cosmos

Epic Cosmos
Clarion Atlas
ArchitectureCentralized aggregation — patient data transmitted to Epic-controlled repository
ArchitectureFederated — queries travel to data; patient records never leave the institution
EHR CompatibilityEpic customers only — non-Epic institutions cannot participate
EHR CompatibilityAny EHR vendor via OMOP Common Data Model transformation
Population DiversityBiased toward large, well-funded health systems that can afford Epic
Population DiversityIncludes safety-net, rural, and community systems for representative research
GovernanceVendor-managed with elected Governing Council advisory role
GovernanceCommunity-elected governance council with binding authority — not advisory
Query InterfaceSelf-service analytics through Cosmos web interface
Query InterfaceVisual cohort builder plus programmatic API for advanced analysis
GenomicsLimited genomic data integration; cancer staging included
GenomicsFull genomic variant, pharmacogenomic, and multi-omics federation
Privacy ModelHIPAA limited data set with vendor-managed access controls
Privacy ModelDifferential privacy, k-anonymity, and institutional data sovereignty
Data ModelEpic proprietary model mapped to standard ontologies post-hoc
Data ModelOMOP Common Data Model — open-source, vendor-neutral, OHDSI-aligned
Case Studies

What happens when research data belongs to the research community, not a vendor.

Multi-Center Research Consortium · 34 Institutions · 5 EHR Vendors

Vendor-agnostic federation enables the first truly representative GLP-1 outcomes study

A 34-institution research consortium studying the cardiovascular and renal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists deployed Atlas to federate clinical data across five different EHR platforms. Previous attempts to study this question had been limited to single-vendor networks that systematically excluded the safety-net institutions where the diabetic population with the highest complication burden receives care. Atlas federated data from 14 academic medical centers, 8 community hospitals, 6 safety-net systems, and 6 rural health networks — producing a cohort of 2.4 million diabetic patients that was the most demographically representative GLP-1 study ever conducted. The analysis identified a 23% cardiovascular risk reduction in a subpopulation of Black patients with CKD stage 3 that had been statistically invisible in prior single-network studies — a finding that changed prescribing guidelines for an underserved population.

34
Institutions across 5 EHR vendors federated
2.4M
Diabetic patients in study cohort
23%
CV risk reduction found in underrepresented subpopulation
0
Patient records shared between institutions
Pharmaceutical Sponsor · Phase III Oncology Trial · National Recruitment

Trial feasibility in 48 hours and 42% minority enrollment through representative site selection

A pharmaceutical company sponsoring a Phase III immunotherapy trial for advanced NSCLC used Atlas to conduct pre-trial feasibility analysis across the federated network. Within 48 hours, Atlas returned de-identified cohort counts meeting the trial's eligibility criteria at each participating institution, stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and prior treatment history. The sponsor identified 14 optimal sites — including four safety-net hospitals and two rural cancer centers that would not have been included in traditional site selection based on investigator reputation. The diverse site portfolio achieved 42% minority enrollment in a trial category where the national average is 14%. Enrollment completed 4.2 months ahead of projected timeline. The FDA cited the trial's demographic representativeness in its review as a strength supporting generalizability of the efficacy findings.

48hr
Feasibility analysis turnaround time
42%
Minority enrollment (vs. 14% national average)
4.2mo
Ahead of projected enrollment timeline
14
Optimal sites identified through data-driven selection
I spent three years trying to study the long-term outcomes of a rare autoimmune condition. My institution had 340 patients. Not enough for statistical significance on any outcome. Cosmos had more patients, but I am at a Meditech hospital — we are excluded. Atlas federated data from 34 institutions across five EHR vendors and gave me a cohort of 12,000 patients. Twelve thousand. I published the definitive outcomes study for a disease that had never been studied at scale. That study would not exist without a vendor-agnostic network. The patients it will help do not care which EHR their hospital uses. Neither should the research infrastructure.
Dr. Priya Venkataraman, Rheumatology Researcher, Community Teaching Hospital
We designed a Phase III immunotherapy trial and assumed we would enroll 80% White patients, as every prior study in this indication had done. Atlas showed us that if we selected sites based on data — actual patient counts meeting eligibility criteria — instead of investigator relationships, we could achieve 42% minority enrollment without extending our timeline. The FDA specifically noted this in their review. The science was better because the population was representative. The regulatory outcome was better because the science was better. We will never design a trial without Atlas feasibility analysis again.
Dr. Christina Park, VP of Clinical Development, Pharmaceutical Sponsor

The research that changes medicine
should not be limited to the data
of one vendor.

See Atlas configured for your research priorities, your institutional data, and your network participation goals.

Or contact us at atlas@brindwell.com