Atlas replaces Epic Cosmos with a federated research data network that is not captive to a single EHR vendor. Where Cosmos aggregates data exclusively from Epic customers, Atlas federates de-identified clinical data from any EHR — Epic, Oracle Health, Meditech, athenahealth, and independent systems — creating a research dataset that is representative of the full diversity of American healthcare, not just the institutions wealthy enough to afford a single vendor's platform. The research that changes medicine should not be limited to the data of organizations that made the same purchasing decision.
Clinical data is the most valuable research asset in medicine. Every diagnosis, every lab result, every medication prescribed, every outcome observed represents a data point that could contribute to discovering a new treatment, identifying a new risk factor, or validating a new clinical pathway. But this data is fragmented across thousands of institutions, stored in proprietary formats controlled by EHR vendors, and accessible only through vendor-specific tools that exclude institutions using competing platforms. Epic Cosmos contains data from 300 million patients — but only from Epic customers. The safety-net hospitals, rural clinics, and community health centers that serve the populations most underrepresented in clinical research are disproportionately likely to use non-Epic systems. The result is a research dataset that is vast but biased — a map of human disease that systematically excludes the communities where disease burden is highest.
Atlas is not a data warehouse. It is a federated network where data stays at the contributing institution and queries travel to the data — not the other way around. This architecture preserves institutional data sovereignty, simplifies regulatory compliance, and eliminates the security risk of centralizing hundreds of millions of patient records in a single repository.
Traditional research data networks aggregate patient records into a central repository — creating a single point of vulnerability, a massive regulatory compliance burden, and an architectural dependence on the vendor who controls the repository. Atlas inverts this model. Each participating institution deploys a local Atlas node that transforms clinical data from its native EHR format into the OMOP Common Data Model, applies HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification with expert determination validation, and exposes a query interface that responds to federated queries from authorized researchers. The query executes locally against the institution's own data, returns only aggregate or de-identified results to the researcher, and the raw patient data never leaves the institution's firewall. This architecture supports participation from any EHR vendor — Epic, Oracle Health, Meditech, or custom systems — because the transformation to OMOP occurs at the local node, not at the source.
Clinical researchers should not need a data analyst to answer a clinical question. Atlas provides a visual query builder that allows researchers to define cohorts, apply inclusion and exclusion criteria, select outcome variables, and execute queries across the federated network — all through a point-and-click interface that requires no SQL, no programming, and no data engineering expertise. A medical student can define a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes diagnosed before age 40 who were treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists and measure their 5-year cardiovascular event rate — and receive results from 280 million patient records in under 60 seconds. The same query through a traditional data request process would take 6 to 12 months. Atlas democratizes access to the data that drives medical discovery.
Real-world evidence from observational data is increasingly accepted by the FDA as supplemental evidence for drug safety and effectiveness. Atlas provides the infrastructure for rigorous observational studies at scale: propensity score matching across millions of patients, time-to-event analyses with competing risk adjustment, negative control outcome validation to detect systematic bias, and study design templates that follow OHDSI best practices for distributed network studies. Pharmaceutical companies, academic researchers, and regulatory agencies can execute the same study protocol simultaneously across every participating institution — with results aggregated without any institution sharing patient-level data. This is not retrospective chart review. This is population-scale epidemiology executed in real time.
Eighty percent of clinical trials fail to meet enrollment timelines. The primary reason is not lack of eligible patients — it is inability to find them. Atlas transforms trial feasibility and recruitment by allowing sponsors and investigators to query the federated network with a trial's eligibility criteria before the first site is activated. The system returns de-identified cohort counts by institution, geography, and demographic composition — enabling sponsors to select sites based on actual patient availability rather than investigator reputation. Once a trial is active, Clarion Praxis's auto-screening module identifies eligible patients at participating institutions and presents them to the investigator with a one-click referral to the research coordinator. The connection between Atlas (discovery) and Praxis (enrollment) creates a closed loop from feasibility to accrual that no single-vendor research network can replicate.
Clinical prediction models are only as good as the data they are trained on. A model trained on a single institution's data reflects that institution's patient population, practice patterns, and biases. Atlas enables federated model training where the model travels to the data, trains locally at each participating institution, and returns only model parameters — not patient data — to be aggregated into a global model. This federated learning architecture produces models that are more generalizable, more equitable, and more robust than any single-institution model. Atlas also provides access to pre-trained clinical foundation models — large-scale models trained on billions of structured clinical events that can be fine-tuned for specific prediction tasks: 30-day readmission, disease progression, treatment response, and adverse event risk.
The future of precision medicine depends on linking molecular data to clinical outcomes at population scale. Atlas extends the federated data model to include structured genomic variants, pharmacogenomic profiles, tumor biomarkers, and multi-omics data from participating institutions that perform next-generation sequencing. A researcher studying the relationship between a specific BRCA2 variant and treatment response to PARP inhibitors can query Atlas for patients carrying that variant across the entire network and analyze their longitudinal treatment outcomes, adverse events, and survival data — without any institution sharing identifiable genomic data. This is the infrastructure that makes precision medicine research possible at the scale where rare variants become statistically analyzable.
Research data networks live or die on trust. Institutions must trust that their data will not be misused. Patients must trust that their privacy is protected. IRBs must trust that the regulatory framework is sound. Atlas builds trust through architectural guarantees, not just policies. Differential privacy adds calibrated noise to query results to prevent re-identification of small populations. K-anonymity thresholds suppress results from cells with fewer than a configurable minimum number of patients. Every query is logged with the researcher's identity, institutional affiliation, stated research purpose, and IRB approval status. A community-elected governance council — modeled on the OHDSI governance framework — oversees data use policies, reviews access requests, and audits compliance. The governance is not vendor-controlled. It is researcher-controlled.
Research that never reaches publication changes nothing. Atlas includes a research lifecycle management layer that supports the journey from hypothesis to manuscript. Reproducible study packages capture the complete methodology — cohort definition, variable selection, statistical analysis plan, and code — in a format that can be shared with peer reviewers and re-executed by other researchers on their own institutional data. FAIR data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are built into every output. Study results can be published to a shared research repository where other institutions can validate findings against their own populations, creating a cycle of discovery, validation, and clinical implementation that accelerates the 17-year bench-to-bedside timeline.
A 34-institution research consortium studying the cardiovascular and renal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists deployed Atlas to federate clinical data across five different EHR platforms. Previous attempts to study this question had been limited to single-vendor networks that systematically excluded the safety-net institutions where the diabetic population with the highest complication burden receives care. Atlas federated data from 14 academic medical centers, 8 community hospitals, 6 safety-net systems, and 6 rural health networks — producing a cohort of 2.4 million diabetic patients that was the most demographically representative GLP-1 study ever conducted. The analysis identified a 23% cardiovascular risk reduction in a subpopulation of Black patients with CKD stage 3 that had been statistically invisible in prior single-network studies — a finding that changed prescribing guidelines for an underserved population.
A pharmaceutical company sponsoring a Phase III immunotherapy trial for advanced NSCLC used Atlas to conduct pre-trial feasibility analysis across the federated network. Within 48 hours, Atlas returned de-identified cohort counts meeting the trial's eligibility criteria at each participating institution, stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and prior treatment history. The sponsor identified 14 optimal sites — including four safety-net hospitals and two rural cancer centers that would not have been included in traditional site selection based on investigator reputation. The diverse site portfolio achieved 42% minority enrollment in a trial category where the national average is 14%. Enrollment completed 4.2 months ahead of projected timeline. The FDA cited the trial's demographic representativeness in its review as a strength supporting generalizability of the efficacy findings.
I spent three years trying to study the long-term outcomes of a rare autoimmune condition. My institution had 340 patients. Not enough for statistical significance on any outcome. Cosmos had more patients, but I am at a Meditech hospital — we are excluded. Atlas federated data from 34 institutions across five EHR vendors and gave me a cohort of 12,000 patients. Twelve thousand. I published the definitive outcomes study for a disease that had never been studied at scale. That study would not exist without a vendor-agnostic network. The patients it will help do not care which EHR their hospital uses. Neither should the research infrastructure.
We designed a Phase III immunotherapy trial and assumed we would enroll 80% White patients, as every prior study in this indication had done. Atlas showed us that if we selected sites based on data — actual patient counts meeting eligibility criteria — instead of investigator relationships, we could achieve 42% minority enrollment without extending our timeline. The FDA specifically noted this in their review. The science was better because the population was representative. The regulatory outcome was better because the science was better. We will never design a trial without Atlas feasibility analysis again.
See Atlas configured for your research priorities, your institutional data, and your network participation goals.